The site where students compete, learn, and make money Tuesday, May 13, 2008
DJIA: -44.13 NASD: 6.63 10-YR: 0.134
 
 
 
 
     
 
     

Are You a Trader or an Investor?

Submitted by john.forman on Thu, 03/06/2008 - 22:42.

I am alway curious to hear how folks differentiate between trading and investing, so this week I started something of a debate among bloggers on the subject. :-)

I was responding to a guy who said he defines the difference basically the same way as everyone else, but that's exactly why I asked the question. It's been my experience that people have an array of views. In particular, a lot of folks I would call stock traders refer to themselves as investors (some of the labeling on this particular site is a great example of that). So when I hear someone say they are an investor, I try to get clarification.

This blogger then goes on to define investing, as he sees it, in this way:

'The main difference between "trading" and "investing" is time horizon. Investors are long term players. They are investing in a business and are making an optimistic bet about the fundamentals of that business in the future.'

Personally, I don't like the first part of that definition related to time, but I do like the latter part about the fundamentals of the business. I won't make an issue of the fact that he used "investing" to define investing. :-)

The reason I don't like the time part of differentiating the two groups is because traders can just as easily hold positions in the long term as hold them for the short term. Similarly, investors can just as easily get out of a position in a couple of days as a couple of years. I will agree, though, that in most cases the anticipated holding period of an investor when entering a position is much longer than when a trader enters into one.

In The Essentials of Trading I talked about the difference as being mainly in terms of the exit plan. Traders generally have them going in, meaning they have a specific set of criteria which will trigger an exit - often something related to price action, but not always.

Investors, though, handle things a bit more nebulously. They will exit a position when the fundamentals no longer support their being long. That, however, isn't something which can easily be defined since there are so many factors involved. It's not usually as cut and dried as falling short on the latest quarter's earnings.

My fellow blogger also differentiated traders and investors by saying the former don't concern themselves with fundamentals. While certainly there are loads of traders who focus only on technical analysis methods, they are only part of the story.

For example, I consider myself generally a stock trader (though I do sometimes invest) because I enter positions with a specific exit plan, but that doesn't mean I ignore the fundamentals. Quite the opposite, in fact. I will rarely trade a stock in which the fundamentals don't back up my technical view. Also, some of my exit criteria are usually based on the fundamentals.

How do you define trading vs. investing? Leave a comment here or join in the debate on my trading education blog and let me know your views on the subject.

Traders...

I believe that broadly speaking, you can define traders as short term investors. The ones that make up the majority of the daily volume. I think, but to be honest I really don't know, the average trader rarely holds a position over night.

Based upon my below example what am I?

Lets say I have have a 7% position in GLD b/c I feel gold is going to a thousand. However then I see gold (which I trade through GLD) jump $25 in a week and the momentum (RSI) is way to high (+70). I decide that based on the chart, it may consolidate, at which point I take 3.5% off the table to lock in some gains even though I still strongly believe Gold is going 1000. I week later gold falls $20, at which time I re-enter and bring my position back to 5-7%.

Not so many day traders

To say that the average trader rarely holds overnight I think is completely wrong. Day traders get all the pub, but actually represent the minority of market participants. They also represent the minority of volume since the really big players aren't generally day traders either.

As for your GLD example, I would call that trading. Everything you talk about is based on price action (including RSI). You may be "invested" in gold based on some fundamental view, but you are most definitely "trading" around your position.

I am both

I always felt like I could/wanted to do both. I think I take a fundamentally different approaching in the two. When I invest, I am ultimately looking for a fundamentally sound business that is trading at a valuation that makes it an attractive entry point. Also, looking at the company's growth rate and where I see the long term macroeconomic trends headed (is it realistic--could this company still add value in 5 years--). I also think investing is, in part, a statement of self. I don't know any environmentalists who would invest in Exxon or any technophobes going with Google. I am sure there are, but I think generally one can glean quite a bit from a person's long term investment.

Trading, which I am less versed in, seems like an all together different beast. I often 'trade' shit companies long and great companies short. I'd never do that with an 'investment' - I guess if you take the inference from that statement though, timeframe has to play into the picture somewhere.

That's it

I don't generally short good companies or buy poor ones, but otherwise I do consider myself both too.